What needs to be clarified
The task is to assess the effect of motion blur on the selected feature, distinguishing observed features from their interpretation. The assessment must consider the suitability of each item and whether the grounds for the proposed conclusion can be checked.
Materials to prepare
- Full video sequence around the chosen frame
- Report with photographic table and ear-feature description
- Original reference photograph and available camera parameters
What to compare
Compare blur direction on the face and stationary objects; check contour recurrence in nearby frames and detail sharpness, separating visible stable shape from exposure-related image extension. Every significant feature is linked to a specific part of the material. Similarities and differences are assessed together, considering alternative explanations and the limitations of the examination method.
Possible outcome of the analysis
A possible deliverable is a review of the disputed contour’s usability, with verifiable examples and reasons for the assessment. Unresolved questions and additional examinations needed are stated separately, without promising an answer in advance.
Limits of the conclusions
Blur cannot reliably recover the obscured ear shape. Conclusions are confined to the examined items and stated conditions; insufficient features require an explicit finding that the relevant question cannot be resolved.