When comparing a person in video, suitable frames are examined in sequence. Selecting a single poor freeze-frame may distort how appearance is depicted and the possibilities of examination.
Subject of examination
- The original video recording and informative frames
- Reliable photographs and video of the person believed to be shown
- Changes in viewing angle, facial expression and lighting
Sample questions for the expert
- Which frames are suitable for comparing appearance?
- Which facial features are consistently depicted throughout the sequence?
- Are they consistent with the comparison images?
- What limitations arise from movement, compression and low resolution?
The final questions are formulated according to the objects and circumstances of the particular task.
What to prepare
- The original recording export covering the entire relevant interval
- Comparison images with reliable provenance
- Information about timing, viewing angles and changes in appearance
- Precise questions and a description of how the video was obtained
How the examination is conducted
Informative frames are selected without creating new details. Where the recording permits, features are checked across several depictions; movement and optical distortion are taken into account.
Scope and limitations
Facial identification does not automatically establish the identity of an account's owner or replace reconstruction of all of a person's actions. Recording quality may limit the answer.
What the deliverable records
The result contains the selected materials, comparative analysis and an explanation of the possibilities and limitations of identification.
Cost and terms
from RUB 80,000. The exact price depends on the number of images, material quality, video duration, comparison complexity, the need for a report review and urgency.